FOUNDATION™ · Mental Fitness™

Schedule the executive roundtable

Four phases, four dated sessions, each one closing on evidence rather than on the session feeling good.

The roundtable is worked in meetings the team already holds. Set the first date and the cadence; the series carries the phase, the practice, the system change and the evidence. Nothing here is stored or sent — the calendar file is built in your browser.

Cadence

The series — Leadership team

  1. Session 1 · Mon, Aug 31, 2026 · 9:00 AM – 10:30 AM · FOUNDATION

    Phase 01Make it safe to be wrong in the room

    Vulnerability-based trust is the base tier and the one thing a team cannot fake. The work is not a trust exercise; it is the leader going first, repeatedly, with real exposure.

    In the room

    • Open one standing meeting with a two-minute settling track, phones down, before the hardest item.
    • One round, one sentence each: what I am protecting in this conversation. The leader answers first and answers honestly.
    • Each member names their DISC style and the one thing about their style that is hardest for the others to work with — style as a way into vulnerability, never as an excuse.

    System change to ship: A standing five-minute slot in one recurring meeting where risk, error and bad news are reported without consequence — owned by the leader, minuted, kept even in a good week.

    Closes on: Four consecutive weeks the slot was used, and one instance of a mistake surfaced early that would previously have surfaced late.

    Open this phase in the coaching path
  2. Session 2 · Mon, Sep 14, 2026 · 9:00 AM – 10:30 AM · LEAD

    Phase 02Have the argument in the room

    Artificial harmony is the expensive kind. The team practises unfiltered debate on the issue while keeping the relationship intact — which is only possible once tier one holds.

    In the room

    • Name the one topic the team has been avoiding, and schedule it as a working item with a stated decision date.
    • Before each debate, one person argues the strongest version of the view they disagree with.
    • Rule for the session: argue the idea, name the interest, no history. The facilitator stops history, not heat.

    System change to ship: Written decision rights for the contested area: who decides, who is consulted, who is informed — circulated, not implied.

    Closes on: One avoided topic closed with a dated decision, and a decision-rights line any member can quote back the same way.

    Open this phase in the coaching path
  3. Session 3 · Mon, Sep 28, 2026 · 9:00 AM – 10:30 AM · SIMPLIFY

    Phase 03Leave with one version of the decision

    Ambiguity is where commitment and accountability both fail. The team practises stating the decision out loud, in the room, in the words each member will repeat to their own team.

    In the room

    • Last ten minutes of every meeting: one person states the decision as they will repeat it. Anyone who would say it differently says so then.
    • Every decision leaves with an owner, a date and who is informed by Friday.
    • Peer-to-peer accountability, once: each member asks one colleague for one behaviour they want continued and one they want stopped.

    System change to ship: One published standard and one cadence for the work the team keeps re-litigating — what good looks like, and when it is reviewed, by someone other than the leader.

    Closes on: Three consecutive meetings closed with a stated decision, owner and date, and no decision reopened without new information.

    Open this phase in the coaching path
  4. Session 4 · Mon, Oct 12, 2026 · 9:00 AM – 10:30 AM · ARC

    Phase 04Hold each other to the result

    The apex tier: collective results ahead of individual status and functional turf. This phase converts eight weeks of behaviour into something the operating cadence keeps doing — ARC™: Analyze, Refine, Commit.

    In the room

    • Re-take the team read and compare movement tier by tier. Never average the tiers.
    • Review the scoreboard against what the team actually did, not what it intended.
    • Name one collective result the whole team is accountable for, with one shared measure.

    System change to ship: The team's practice and its measure live on the existing renewal board with a review date inside a meeting that already exists — never a new meeting.

    Closes on: A before-and-after tier read, one collective measure on the scoreboard, and a dated review owned by name.

    Open this phase in the coaching path

Awareness is never the intervention. Each session closes only when the system change has shipped and the evidence exists — then ARC™ (Analyze · Refine · Commit) raises the standard rather than repeating the session.

Instruments and attribution

The Five Dysfunctions of a Team model, the team pyramid, and the fifteen-statement team assessment are the work of Patrick Lencioni, published by Jossey-Bass, a Wiley brand. Used here for facilitated development purposes with attribution. Compass Performance, Inc. is not affiliated with, nor endorsed by, Patrick Lencioni, The Table Group, or Wiley.

Positive Intelligence®, the PQ® Score, and the Saboteur model are trademarks and the work of Shirzad Chamine and Positive Intelligence, LLC. Compass Performance, Inc. does not own them and claims no rights in them; Compass is an independent user of these licensed instruments. The Compass service is Mental Fitness™, and the reading, interpretation and commentary here are Compass's own. No affiliation, sponsorship or endorsement by Shirzad Chamine or Positive Intelligence, LLC is implied.

Not sure where to start?

Three questions, and we point you to the right instrument.

Under a minute. From this page, most leaders begin with The organization.