Food & beverage manufacturer · ~$65M revenue · single plant, two channels
Starting the second curve at a $65M food manufacturer while the first was still strong
A renewal cadence and a commercial architecture moved 24% of revenue to a new channel in two years without disturbing the core business.
- Disciplines deployed
- LEAD → GROW
- Measurement window
- 24 months
- Measures reported
- 4
Condition 07 of eight
Performance has plateaued or regressed
What worked before has stopped producing. Effort rises, margin does not.
All eight conditionsPresent reality
The core private-label business was profitable and flat, and its largest customer represented 38% of revenue. Every attempt at a branded channel had been started, staffed part-time, and abandoned within two quarters.
Constraint
The new curve competed with the old one for the same people, capital, and weekly attention — with no separate cadence or measures, the mature business always won and the new one always died.
Intervention — architecture installed
Renewal read on the current curve, commercial architecture for the new channel with its own measures and gates, capacity and capital protected in the plan, ARC™ renewal cadence separating the two horizons.
FOUNDATION → SIMPLIFY → LEAD → GROW
Mapped to the operating system
What was architected inside each discipline, and the measured consequence. Disciplines held out of scope are shown with the reason — nothing is implied by omission.
1. FOUNDATION
Build
Held out of scope
The existing operating model was sound and was deliberately left untouched, so the core business was not disturbed by the new channel.
Result: Core-channel service and margin held throughout the two years.
FOUNDATION →2. SIMPLIFY
Focus
Held out of scope
Not loaded: the constraint was the absence of a second curve, not the complexity of the first.
Result: Focus was added by choosing one new channel, not by removing work.
SIMPLIFY →3. LEAD
Execute
Loaded in this engagement
A separate review for the new channel with its own leading measures, so early-curve work was not judged on mature-curve numbers.
Result: The new channel was governed separately from month one and never competed for the core review.
LEAD →4. GROW
Scale
Loaded in this engagement
Commercial architecture for the new channel — offer, route to market, and the capability required to serve it.
Result: 24% of revenue moved to the new channel within two years.
GROW →
ARC™ — the renewal loop around all four
The renewal cadence is the engagement's centre: the second curve is reviewed on its own measures while the first curve is still strong.
ARC™ →Measured result — what moved, and by how much
| Measure | Before | After (24 months) | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue from the new channel | 0% | 24% | +24 pts |
| Largest-customer concentration | 38% | 23% | −15 pts |
| Core-business EBITDA margin | 10.8% | 11.3% | +0.5 pts |
| New-product decisions reaching a gate decision | 2 of 9 | 9 of 9 | +7 |
Revenue from the new channel
+24 pts
Before0%After24%Standardized against Revenue from the new channel or curve — Trailing twelve months; channel boundary defined once and held.
Largest-customer concentration
−15 pts
Before38%After23%Standardized against Largest-customer concentration — Trailing twelve months at both readings.
Core-business EBITDA margin
+0.5 pts
Before10.8%After11.3%Standardized against EBITDA margin — Core private-label business only, same adjustments.
New-product decisions reaching a gate decision
+350%
Before2After9Standardized against Decisions reaching a gate decision — Abandoned-without-decision counts as not reached.
The second curve now carries a quarter of revenue while the first curve is more profitable than when the work started.
Transfer — what the client now owns
The leadership team owns the ARC™ renewal cadence and the commercial gates, and decides horizon funding without Compass in the room.
Compass leaves architects, not dependency.
Client identities, brands, and locations are withheld under confidentiality. Metrics are client-reported and measured over the window shown; they describe those engagements and are not a projection of results for any other enterprise.
Start with your own present reality
Every engagement above began with an honest read of the architecture already producing the results. Score yours, or schedule a conversation.
Share this
Share on LinkedIn- Industrial manufacturer · ~$140M revenue · 3 plantsRebuilding the operating model of a $140M industrial manufacturerDecision rights and one executive cadence lifted on-time delivery from 82% to 96% and EBITDA margin by 3.1 points in twelve months.
- Multi-site professional services firm · 240 people · 6 officesConcentration read that lifted a services firm from 31% to 39% gross marginAn 80/20 read across clients, services, and initiatives let the firm exit 22% of revenue and raise margin without adding people.
- Family enterprise · second generation · 600+ employeesBuilding successor readiness in a second-generation family enterpriseReady-now successors went from one role to six of seven, and ownership transitioned on a planned timeline instead of in crisis.
- Multi-site distributor · ~$310M revenue · 4 distribution centersAn ERP transformation that landed because the operating system was architected firstSequencing architecture ahead of configuration cut go-live disruption and moved value realization from 14 months to 5.
- Founder-led specialty services company · ~$46M revenue · 190 peopleRemoving the founder as the bottleneck in a $46M founder-led companyDecision rights and a leadership operating rhythm moved the founder out of daily approvals and released two days a week to growth work.
- Multi-site healthcare services group · ~$88M net revenue · 11 clinicsRestoring throughput across an 11-site healthcare services groupOne scheduling standard and a site-level operating review lifted clinician utilization from 61% to 79% and cut patient wait times by nineteen days.
- Regional commercial contractor · ~$210M revenue · 4 market segmentsRestoring project margin at a $210M regional contractorA bid gate and one project operating cadence turned an 8-point margin fade into a 1.4-point fade and lifted win rate on target work.
- Sponsor-backed platform · ~$95M add-on acquisition · two operating brandsIntegrating an acquisition without stalling either businessAn integration architecture built before close held both businesses' service levels through the transition and captured synergy nine months early.
- Industrial group · ~$210M revenue · four business units, one shared plant networkRenewing the operating system of a $210M industrial group that had outgrown its own designAn ARC™ renewal loop retired 23 of 31 competing initiatives, returned 22 points of executive calendar from work owned two levels down, and lifted EBITDA margin 2.4 points in eighteen months — with no new strategy.
- Composite example · Wholesale distribution · ~$310M revenue · 5 branchesComposite example: a distributor that recovered 4.2 margin points without raising priceComposite example — pricing authority, an SKU-level 80/20 read and one commercial cadence moved gross margin from 21.4% to 25.6% and released $6.4M of working capital.
- Composite example · Field service & installation · ~$120M revenue · 240 techniciansComposite example: a field-service business that added 28% capacity with the same headcountComposite example — a value-stream redesign and standard work lifted billable utilization from 58% to 74% and cut the quote-to-schedule window from 11 days to 3.
- Composite example · Tech-enabled services · ~$85M revenue · 520 peopleComposite example: a founder-led firm that built the bench its plan requiredComposite example — a capability architecture and governed development sequence filled 7 of 8 key seats internally and cut leadership turnover from 24% to 9%.
- Anonymous client story · Contract manufacturer · ~400 employees · multiple production facilities · owner-operatedGrowth arrived; the operating structure did notAnonymous client story — value streams with named owners and written decision rights lifted on-time delivery from 78% to 94% and cut executive escalations by 81% in nine months.